Go to Original
Nothing Sweeter to Bush Than Revenge
By HELEN THOMAS
HEARST NEWSPAPERS
Sunday 01 June 2003
WASHINGTON -- Revenge must be very sweet,
considering the hard-nosed approach the Bush administration takes
toward those who opposed the president's decision to invade Iraq.
President Bush's personal grudge against several
nations is still obvious, including France, Germany, Russia,
Turkey, Canada, Mexico and Chile.
There was a period in the lead-up to the war
when White House press secretary Ari Fleischer made it clear that
the president wasn't accepting telephone calls from some of the
leaders who had rebuffed him on the question of going to war.
France especially remains in the U.S. doghouse.
French diplomats have complained about rumors that they had given
visas to fleeing Iraqi leaders. Not so, said the French in a
vigorous denial.
Even more sinister, Secretary of State Colin
Powell -- in an uncharacteristic role as the godfather-enforcer
for the administration -- has been lecturing straying nations that
they will be punished for their stand against the war. As he puts
it, they will suffer the "consequences." The exact penalties are
never spelled out but the ominous threat is left hanging.
Some diplomacy!
German leader Gerhard Schroeder felt the sting
when he sought a one-on-one meeting with Bush at the G-8 Economic
Summit in Evian, France, next week only to be informed that there
"won't be time."
Bush cancelled a May 5 visit to Canada to
display his displeasure with Prime Minister Jean Chretien's stand
on the war.
Relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin,
which had been friendly and close, turned sour temporarily after
Russia opposed the war. The Bush administration made a big show of
slowing down its efforts to persuade Congress to repeal the 1974
Jackson-Vanik law. Repeal of the law, which ties trade to an
easing of Russian emigration, has been a long-sought goal of
Russia.
More recently Putin has written to Bush seeking
cooperation "at all levels."
Turkey wound up on the hit list when the Turkish
people rebelled against U.S. wishes and denied use of their soil
for U.S. forces to attack Iraq.
Chile, which also opposed the war, paid a price
when Bush delayed signing the long-sought free trade agreement.
The U.S. trade representative now will ink the pact June 6 in
Miami.
Meantime, the United States and Britain have
taken control of Iraq's economy and its oil fields. The Bush
administration gave contracts to Halliburton -- Vice President
Cheney's old company -- and to Bechtel -- where former Secretary
of State George Shultz is on the board -- without competitive
bidding.
The United Nations will be given minimal
authority in the reconstruction and economic revival.
Powell was in Paris recently for a meeting with
seven foreign ministers of the Western industrialized states to
make preparations for the upcoming G-8 summit.
Asked by reporters whether the United States
intended to punish the French, Powell replied, "No," but added a
chilling observation:
"You take note of those who disagree with you,
and you try to find out why and if it is appropriate to draw some
conclusions. And consequences follow those conclusions."
Rumors that Bush planned to stay at a hotel in
nearby Switzerland in order to snub his French host, President
Jacques Chirac, were denied.
Pentagon officials said they were reviewing
plans for joint military exercises with France and other countries
"in the light of changed circumstances." One spokesman confirmed
that the French would not be invited to the so-called "Red Flag"
Air Force exercise in Nevada next year.
All of this makes the United States look pretty
petty. The Bush administration is demanding an oath of
unquestioning loyalty from its allies. Those that fail to toe the
line now must seek forgiveness on bended knee.
The Bush administration has treated the United
Nations in the same autocratic way.
Is everyone supposed to march in lockstep with
the United States?
While the accent is on punishment of those who
dare to disagree, the leaders of friendly nations get the full
charm treatment. They may be invited to a White House state dinner
or to the president's ranch in Crawford, Texas, where nearly a
dozen world leaders have been hosted as a symbol of presidential
appreciation that they are loyal members of the team.
Bush would do better on the international stage
if he would mend relations with old and trusted friends, instead
of alienating and isolating them as he now seems bent on doing.
The world would be better off.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes.)