The State of the Union
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Tuesday 31 January
2006
i knew
that i was dying.
something in me said, go ahead, die, sleep, become
them, accept.
then something else in me said, no, save the tiniest
bit.
it needn't be much, just a spark.
a spark can set a whole forest on
fire.
just a spark.
save it.
- Charles Bukowski
"He shall from
time to time," reads the Constitution, "give to the Congress information of
the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures
as he shall judge necessary and expedient." And so it shall be. George W.
Bush will be speaking tonight from the podium in the House of
Representatives. Before him will be arrayed Senators, Representatives,
generals and judges. The balconies will be filled with observers,
luminaries, reporters and a few so-called "special guests" whose presence
will be used to reinforce some argument or another.
It shall be quite
a thing to see, a show worth watching if only to observe exactly how many
lies, distortions, threats, taunts and smirks can be crammed into a single
speech. This will be Mr. Bush speaking, after all, and the truth is not in
him. It will be in every pertinent sense a mere commercial, a television
advertisement from a failing company, a whitewashing of ugly truths by a
staggering CEO whose sole desire is to keep the stockholders in line for
another quarter.
In the interests
of truth, the actual state of this union deserves to be displayed for all to
see. This is the deal. This is how it is.
The Real
Economy
Since 2000, the
number of Americans living in poverty has risen to nearly 37 million. More
than 13 million of these are children. More than one in four American
families with children make less than $30,000 a year. Look within that
number and you will find 46% of African American families with children and
44% of Hispanic families with children fall below this mark. Average annual
income for Americans fell once again in 2005. 46 million Americans live
without health insurance.
The response to
this? Vice President Cheney, three days before Christmas, cast the
tie-breaking vote on a spending reduction bill that will fall most heavily
on the poor, the infirm and the elderly. Funding for health care, child
support, and education subsidies for low-income families has been gutted.
Medicaid benefits for the poor were cut by $7 billion, and Medicare programs
for the elderly were cut by $6.4 billion. Federal student-loan programs were
cut by $12.7 billion.
On the very same
day, the Senate passed legislation that drastically cut funding for the
departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. The Head
Start program was hit especially hard: the cuts here eliminate some 25,000
slots for low-income children. All in all, these spending reductions are
expected to save $40 billion.
Meanwhile,
recently-passed tax cuts ravage the budget far more deeply than these
drastic budget cuts. Two tax cuts in particular that went into effect on New
Year's Day will cost $27 billion, more than half of what the spending
reductions are supposed to save. These cuts will cost more than $150 billion
over the next ten years. 97% of the money from these cuts will go to
households making more than $200,000 a year. Households with incomes under
$100,000 will get 0.1% of these cuts.
If all of Mr.
Bush's tax cuts are stopped or allowed to expire, $750 billion will be added
to the federal budget. That is more than enough to pay for the programs that
have been eviscerated. It won't happen, not with the priorities of this
administration, but that is the simple math of the matter.
New Orleans
Drowned in a Bathtub
The first weeks of
September brought to all Americans a devastating tragedy. The city of New
Orleans was all but obliterated by Hurricane Katrina when levees meant to
hold back the waters failed. The failure of these levees came, in no small
part, because of unprecedented budget cuts for the Army Corps of Engineers,
which was tasked to keep the levees viable.
The tragedy was
compounded by the utterly incompetent management of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency and its head, Michael Brown, whose experience with
disaster management came while he was serving as an attorney for owners of
Arabian horses. In the weeks to follow, lavish promises were made by Mr.
Bush. "We will do what it takes, we will stay as long as it takes, to help
citizens rebuild their communities and their lives," he said on September
15th.
Those promises
have been broken. We have gone from oaths to revive this cherished city to
this: "I want to remind people in that part of the world, $85 billion is a
lot," said Bush on January 26th. Hundreds of thousands of Americans remain
displaced, many holding on by the skin of their teeth in cramped trailers.
Thirty million cubic yards of debris remain uncollected - the Washington
Post estimated over the weekend that this was "enough to build a five-sided
column more than 50 stories tall over the Pentagon." There is not even a
plan in place to begin to attack the problem. The Bush administration has
left New Orleans to rot, and the next hurricane season is four months away.
Anti-tax crusader
Grover Norquist once famously stated that he wanted to shrink the federal
government to the size where it could be drowned in a bathtub. As evidenced
by the budget cuts and tax giveaways described above, many within this
government feel as Norquist does. Thanks to their actions, to the cuts in
the Army Corps of Engineers budget, to the nomination of useless cronies
like Brown to vital positions of civil defense, to a war in Iraq that has
bled the budget further and left Louisiana without sufficient National Guard
troops to help the population, it is New Orleans that has been drowned in
Norquist's bathtub. A major American city has been shattered, and nothing is
done about it.
To add insult to
injury, the Bush administration utterly refuses to answer any questions on
the matter. Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, perhaps the most
widely-known Democratic defender of Mr. Bush, is the ranking minority member
on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Even Mr.
Lieberman is flabbergasted by the stonewalling of the White House.
"My staff believes
that DHS (the Department of Homeland Security) has engaged in a conscious
strategy of slow-walking our investigation in the hope that we would run out
of time to follow the investigation's natural progression to where it
leads," Lieberman said last week. "At this point, I cannot disagree. There's
been no assertion of executive privilege, just a refusal to answer. I have
been told by my staff that almost every question our staff has asked federal
agency witnesses regarding conversations with or involvement of the White
House has been met with a response that they could not answer on direction
of the White House."
Mark Folse, a New
Orleans native, operates a blog called "Wet Bank Guide." On Monday, Mr.
Folse posted a message for Mr. Bush. "I've never lost the deepest allegiance
I've ever held: to my city," wrote Folse. "We have always known we were a
people different and unique, as divided as we may seem. That sense of
identity as a New Orleanian is the powerful bond that draws me on. It is the
deep love of country that drives me - of my country, New Orleans and
southern Louisiana. It is the irrational emotional attachment to my piece of
America that leads men and women to go willingly up Bunker Hill, to follow
General Pickett, to volunteer for Iraq."
"A life of assured
privilege has protected you from having to take these sorts of risks,"
continued Folse, "to find the strength to get up and go into the maw of
uncertainty, to risk and gamble your own and not other peoples' lives or
money. You can pledge allegiance or sing the anthem or give a stirring
speech as well as any, but you know you have no allegiance except
self-interest."
"If nothing moves
you except your own self-interest," concluded Folse, "then consider this.
There are hundreds of thousands of us, scattered throughout most of the
United States. We are everywhere you and your party will go to campaign:
Arkansas and Atlanta and Austin, Dallas and Detroit and Denver, Los Angeles
and Las Vegas, Baltimore and Boston, Chicago and Charlotte. Many will remain
there indefinitely, unable to go home, precisely because you have lied to
them and betrayed them. We will not let you escape from the net of lies you
have woven. Wherever you turn, you will find us, ready to call you out."
The situation in
New Orleans is a problem that will not go away. Men like Mark Folse will
make absolutely sure of that.
"Scandal" Is
Too Small a Word
The Abramoff
scandal directly touches some sixty Republican congresspeople, according to
campaign finance records that show where the disgraced lobbyist sent his
money. Mr. Bush recently promoted the lead investigator in this case,
effectively removing him from the investigation. Despite this, the hard look
into Mr. Abramoff's dealings continue. Mr. Abramoff's plea deal has a lot of
people in Washington suffering from flop-sweat.
Patrick
Fitzgerald's investigation into the outing of a deep-cover CIA agent by
administration officials continues apace, and has already cashiered Cheney's
chief of staff, Lewis Libby. According to t r u t h o u t investigative
reporter Jason Leopold, Fitzgerald has "spent the past month preparing
evidence he will present to a grand jury alleging that White House Deputy
Chief of Staff Karl Rove knowingly made false statements to FBI and Justice
Department investigators and lied under oath while he was being questioned
about his role in the leak of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity more
than two years ago, according to sources knowledgeable about the probe."
"Although there
have not been rumblings regarding Fitzgerald's probe into the Plame leak
since he met with the grand jury hearing evidence in the case more than a
month ago," continued Leopold in his
January 10th
report, "the sources said that Fitzgerald has been quietly building his
case against Rove and has been interviewing witnesses, in some cases for the
second and third time, who have provided him with information related to
Rove's role in the leak."
None of this will
be mentioned in the State of the Union speech tonight. The Bush
administration continues to stonewall these investigations with all its
might - Mr. Bush has denied ever knowing Jack Abramoff, despite the
existence of several pictures showing them glad-handing each other in the
White House - and the Republican-controlled congress will certainly do
nothing to advance the questions being asked.
In contrast, a
portion of the speech will certainly be dedicated to moralistic sloganeering
about values. Remember, as high-flown words about truth and justice are
spoken, what the Abramoff and Plame scandals represent: a government run by
thieves, stroked by swindlers, and staffed by assassins who sing of
defending the nation even as they cast us down into greater danger.
And, by the way,
the Enron trial started on Monday.
The Middle East
2,242 American
soldiers have died in Iraq. Tens of thousands more are grievously wounded.
Tens and tens of thousands of civilians are dead or maimed. Scores more
simmer in rage and pick up weapons to attack American forces. American
soldiers wishing to go around the Pentagon to augment their meager armor
have been threatened with the revocation of death benefits for their
families. A coalition of fundamentalist Shiite groups has taken over the
government, the two main parts of which are notorious terrorist
organizations with umbilical ties to Iran. Hundreds of billions of dollars
have been spent to do this. There is no end in sight.
Three years ago,
in another State of the Union address, Mr. Bush told the nation that Iraq
was in possession of 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum
toxin, 500 tons (which is 1,000,000 pounds) of sarin, mustard and VX nerve
agent, 30,000 munitions to deliver these agents, mobile biological weapons
labs, al Qaeda connections, and uranium from Niger for use in a robust
nuclear weapons program. Mr. Bush will have to work very hard tonight to
tell a lie as vast, dramatic and bloody as this.
Certainly, Mr.
Bush will sing the praises of bringing democracy to the Middle East. It is
worthwhile, however, to consider what his concept of democracy has
accomplished to date. Six months ago, a radical named Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
was elected president of Iran. Thanks to the intense feelings within Iran's
populace about the US occupation of Iraq, Ahmadinejad has been able to unify
his country behind the establishment of a nuclear program that frightens the
rest of the world. Ahmadinejad's election itself owes a great deal to Mr.
Bush's policies on Iraq.
Last week, the
terrorist organization Hamas was overwhelmingly elected by the Palestinian
people to run their government, leaving the Fatah party shocked and
displaced. While the success of Hamas has much to do with Fatah's corruption
and lack of progress on several fronts, the slow radicalization of the
general population in the Middle East once again can be laid at the doorstep
of Mr. Bush. It has been revealed that Bush's decision to disengage from the
peace process between Israel and Palestine several years ago was a
disastrous choice. Couple that with the occupation of Iraq and the torture
of its citizens, and few can be surprised when the general population in the
Middle East turns toward more radical elements.
Democracy is a
tricky thing. The fact that people in Iraq, Iran and Palestine are afforded
the opportunity to vote, instead of suffering the absolute control of a
dictatorship, is arguably a good thing in the main. Yet methods matter. When
the Iraqi people are given the vote by way of a ravaging war that inflames
the passions of the region and enshrines a radical government, democracy
becomes its own worst enemy. When that ravaging war empowers a fringe
president in Iran, democracy becomes its own worst enemy.
Methods matter.
Democracy does not exist in a vacuum. When it is forced upon a population at
the point of a sword, that population will see the sword as the best viable
option to exercise its collective will. Almost immediately, democracy will
be used to elect radicals, and those radicals will dispose of democracy at
the first opportunity. The radicalization of governments all across the
Middle East has made the world substantially more dangerous. Mr. Bush will
speak of progress tonight. The only progress being made is toward a general
conflagration.
On the other hand,
Exxon Mobil has posted a $32 billion profit for the last year. This stands
as the largest single one-year profit in the entire history of the world.
Progress indeed.
The Unitary
Executive Tapping Your Phone
Mr. Bush and
friends have been jumping through flaming hoops to justify the blatantly
illegal policy of spying on Americans by way of the National Security
Agency. Their tortured arguments in favor of this action, and their
flat-footed declaration that the policy will continue, makes confetti of the
Fourth Amendment.
More than that,
however, it moves this nation one step closer to having an Executive Branch
that supersedes all others in power and scope. Not only will Mr. Bush spy on
whomever he pleases, but he will also torture whomever he pleases. Put
simply, the constitutionally-required separation of powers, the checks and
balances that have maintained the stability of this republic, is being
destroyed. This will echo down the corridors of our history long after Mr.
Bush has left his office.
On Monday
afternoon, Senate Democrats failed to muster the necessary 41 votes needed
to avoid cloture on the nomination of Samuel Alito. The man will be elevated
to the highest court. Beyond the fact that Alito is hostile to a woman's
right to choose, hostile to privacy rights in the face of unwarranted police
intrusion, and hostile to the poor and disadvantaged, there is the matter of
his opinion on the powers of the Executive. In short, he agrees with Mr.
Bush.
The Reign of
Witches
The state of this
union is not good. We are poorer, frightened, faced with the swelling ranks
of enemies our leaders have created, and hell-bent to do away with the most
precious aspects of our system of government. We are surveilled,
propagandized, intimidated. We empower the radicals and disenfranchise the
common good. We are fed swill via the television and thus convinced that
what they tell us is what we already believe. We are bought, and we are paid
for.
The radicals
running this country have long desired to destroy the government's ability
to govern - they found things like taxes intrusive, which is amusing when
one hears them now defending warrantless spying on Americans - and they are
well along the path towards success. The budget is destroyed, spent on tax
cuts and the Iraq occupation, while millions of Americans suffer the loss of
necessary services. The one percent of the one percent is making a killing,
and the rest of us are left behind.
If there is hope
to be found in all this, it is in the words of Thomas Jefferson, written 208
years ago after the passage of the Sedition Act.
"A little
patience, and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their spells
dissolve, and the people, recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit, and incurring the horrors of a war and long
oppressions of enormous public debt. If the game runs sometimes against us
at home we must have patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an
opportunity of winning back the principles we have lost, for this is a game
where principles are at stake."

William
Rivers Pitt is a New York Times and internationally bestselling author
of two books:
War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know and
The Greatest Sedition Is Silence.